Helmet Noninvasive Ventilation in COVID-19

 

TAKE-HOME MESSAGE

  • This randomized trial of patients with COVID-19 admitted to the ICU shows that, compared with high-flow nasal oxygen, helmet noninvasive ventilation resulted in similar days free of respiratory support.

  • Helmet noninvasive ventilation fails to yield significant improvement in management of COVID-19–related hypoxemic respiratory failure.
–  Neil Majithia, MD

IMPORTANCE

High-flow nasal oxygen is recommended as initial treatment for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure and is widely applied in patients with COVID-19.

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether helmet noninvasive ventilation can increase the days free of respiratory support in patients with COVID-19 compared with high-flow nasal oxygen alone.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Multicenter randomized clinical trial in 4 intensive care units (ICUs) in Italy between October and December 2020, end of follow-up February 11, 2021, including 109 patients with COVID-19 and moderate to severe hypoxemic respiratory failure (ratio of partial pressure of arterial oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen ≤200).

INTERVENTIONS

Participants were randomly assigned to receive continuous treatment with helmet noninvasive ventilation (positive end-expiratory pressure, 10-12 cm H2O; pressure support, 10-12 cm H2O) for at least 48 hours eventually followed by high-flow nasal oxygen (n = 54) or high-flow oxygen alone (60 L/min) (n = 55).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was the number of days free of respiratory support within 28 days after enrollment. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of patients who required endotracheal intubation within 28 days from study enrollment, the number of days free of invasive mechanical ventilation at day 28, the number of days free of invasive mechanical ventilation at day 60, in-ICU mortality, in-hospital mortality, 28-day mortality, 60-day mortality, ICU length of stay, and hospital length of stay.

RESULTS

Among 110 patients who were randomized, 109 (99%) completed the trial (median age, 65 years [interquartile range {IQR}, 55-70]; 21 women [19%]). The median days free of respiratory support within 28 days after randomization were 20 (IQR, 0-25) in the helmet group and 18 (IQR, 0-22) in the high-flow nasal oxygen group, a difference that was not statistically significant (mean difference, 2 days [95% CI, -2 to 6]; P = .26). Of 9 prespecified secondary outcomes reported, 7 showed no significant difference. The rate of endotracheal intubation was significantly lower in the helmet group than in the high-flow nasal oxygen group (30% vs 51%; difference, -21% [95% CI, -38% to -3%]; P = .03). The median number of days free of invasive mechanical ventilation within 28 days was significantly higher in the helmet group than in the high-flow nasal oxygen group (28 [IQR, 13-28] vs 25 [IQR 4-28]; mean difference, 3 days [95% CI, 0-7]; P = .04). The rate of in-hospital mortality was 24% in the helmet group and 25% in the high-flow nasal oxygen group (absolute difference, -1% [95% CI, -17% to 15%]; P > .99).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among patients with COVID-19 and moderate to severe hypoxemia, treatment with helmet noninvasive ventilation, compared with high-flow nasal oxygen, resulted in no significant difference in the number of days free of respiratory support within 28 days. Further research is warranted to determine effects on other outcomes, including the need for endotracheal intubation.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Consensus Statement on the Relationship Between Centric Occlusion and the Maximal Intercuspal Position and Their Use as Treatment Positions for Complete Mouth Rehabilitation

Image
  TAKE-HOME MESSAGE This best evidence consensus statement aimed to examine the relationship between centric occlusion (CO) and maximal intercuspation position (MIP) and the use of either as a treatment position for complete mouth rehabilitations in dentate or partially dentate patients. A total of 313 articles contributed to this review, finding that CO and MIP are not coincident in a majority of the population. With regard to complete mouth rehabilitation, most reports suggest that CO provides a physiologic, reliable, and reproducible position, with limited reports finding an association between TMJ symptomatology and CO-MIP discrepancies in the treated dentition. While CO-MIP discrepancies are the norm in the natural dentition, complete rehabilitations seem to perform better at CO rather than MIP based on available evidence. It should be noted that the authors could not include lower-quality evidence supporting the use of MIP as the treatment position due to the inclusion criteria o
Read more

Impact of Lockdown on Children's Lifestyle and Their Collaboration During Dental Sessions

Image
  TAKE-HOME MESSAGE The behavior of 212 Italian children, aged 3 to 16 years, during dental visits was assessed before and after lockdown orders in Italy. The authors hypothesized that the lockdown strengthened relationships between children and parents, favorably affecting child behavior at the dental office. It was found that 82% of children had an improvement in behavior after the lockdown, especially children whose parents were home with the child during the lockdown. This study showed an improvement in child behavior at the dental office after lockdown orders. Further investigations are necessary to validate findings and evaluate child behavior during lockdown in other populations and locations. –  James  Boynton, DDS, MS AIM To analyse lifestyle of Italian families during lockdown, evaluating its possible impact on the collaboration of children with the paediatric dentist and associated predictive factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS Only patients aged between 3 and 16 years, who had s
Read more

Comparison of Coronoidectomy With Coronoidotomy for Improving Maximum Incisal Opening in Patients With Oral Submucous Fibrosis

Image
  TAKE-HOME MESSAGE A randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare coronoidectomy with coronoidotomy to improve mouth opening in oral submucous fibrosis (OSMF) patients. A total of 32 OSMF patients with grade III (moderately advanced with an interincisal opening between 15 and 25 mm) and grade IVa (advanced cases with 15 mm or less incisal opening) were randomized into two groups of 16 to undergo either coronoidectomy (surgical removal of the coronoid process) or coronoidotomy (surgical detachment of the coronoid process). Significant mouth opening was achieved in both groups, and the maximal incisal opening in both groups was comparable (approximately 30 mm in coronoidectomy group and 29 mm in coronoidotomy group at 1 year). The authors found a statistically significant difference in duration of surgery and volume of blood loss, with coronoidotomy requiring much less time (approximately 2 hours vs 3.5 hours) and leading to much less blood loss (approximately 90 mL vs 393 mL) c
Read more